注册 | 登录 | 充值

首页-> 学术资讯 -> 文献解读

【热门文献】食管切除术是否为80岁以上患者提供生存优势?

文献解读

2022-07-19      

806 0


目的:探讨食管癌切除术是否为可切除的高龄胸椎食管癌患者提供生存优势。


日本国家癌症中心的国家基于医院的癌症登记处数据库中检索了2008年至2011年的数据,将患者分为≥75的组(75-79岁; N = 2935),≥80岁组(80岁及以上; N = 2131),比较患者背景和生存曲线。 建立多变量Cox比例风险回归模型,比较两组患者食管切除术和放化疗的效果。 


≥75组(34.6%)接受食管贲门切除术的患者比例明显高于≥80组(18.4%)。 在接受食管切除术的患者中,≥75组3年生存率为51.1%,≥80组3年生存率为39.0% (P < 0.001)。 但在接受放化疗的患者中,两组患者的生存曲线无统计学差异(P = 0.17)。 多变量Cox比例风险分析显示,与放化疗相比,在≥75的临床ii-iii期患者中,食管切除与更好的生存期显著相关(调整后的HR: 0.731) (95%CI: 0.645-0.829, P < 0.001),而在≥80的组中则没有。


Abstract

Objective: To determine whether esophagectomy provides a survival advantage in octogenarians with resectable thoracic esophageal cancer.


Summary background data: Elderly patients with thoracic esophageal cancer do not always receive the full standard treatment; however, advanced age alone should not preclude the use of effective treatment that could meaningfully improve survival.


Methods: We retrieved the 2008 to 2011 data from the National Database of Hospital-based Cancer Registries from the National Cancer Centerin Japan, divided the patients into a ≥75 group (75-79 years; n = 2935) and a ≥80 group (80 years or older; n = 2131), and then compared the patient backgrounds and survival curves. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was developed to compare the effects of esophagectomy and chemoradiotherapy in the 2 groups.


Results: A significantly greater percentage of patients were treated with esoph-agectomy in the ≥75 group (34.6%) than the ≥80 group (18.4%). Among patients who received esophagectomy, the 3-year survival rate was 51.1% in the ≥ 75 group and 39.0% in the ≥80 group (P < 0.001). However, among patients who received chemoradiotherapy, there was no difference in survival curve between the 2 groups (P = 0.17). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that esoph-agectomy for clinical Stage ii-iii patients was significantly associated to better survival (adjusted HR: 0.731) (95%CI: 0.645-0.829, P < 0.001) in the ≥75 group but not the ≥ 80 group when compared with chemoradiotherapy.


Conclusions: Many octogenarians do not necessarily get a survival benefit from esophagectomy. However, patients should be evaluated based on their overall health before ruling out surgery based on age alone.


原文链接

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33630469/



科研资讯(站内):

百度浏览   来源 : 医微客   


版权声明:本网站所有注明来源“医微客”的文字、图片和音视频资料,版权均属于医微客所有,非经授权,任何媒体、网站或个人不得转载,授权转载时须注明来源:”医微客”。本网所有转载文章系出于传递更多信息之目的,且明确注明来源和作者,转载仅作观点分享,版权归原作者所有。不希望被转载的媒体或个人可与我们联系,我们将立即进行删除处理。 本站拥有对此声明的最终解释权。

科研搜索(百度):医学科研





发表评论

注册或登后即可发表评论

登录注册

全部评论(0)

没有更多评论了哦~

科研资讯 更多>>
  • 重磅!医药反腐重要文件发布,释..
  • 铂敏感复发性卵巢癌诊治中国专家..
  • 刘进回应规培生自杀事件:医生必..
  • 医客调研——为药械企业市场策略..
  • 推荐阅读 更多>>
  • 【热门文献】淋巴结比率改善接受..
  • 【热门文献】McKeown与Ivor-Lewi..
  • 【热门文献】静脉灌注马歇尔乙醇..
  • 【热门文献】随机临床试验的试验..
    • 相关阅读
    • 热门专题
    • 推荐期刊
    • 学院课程
    • 医药卫生
      期刊级别:国家级期刊
      发行周期:暂无数据
      出版地区:其他
      影响因子:暂无数据
    • 中华肿瘤
      期刊级别:北大核心期刊
      发行周期:月刊
      出版地区:北京
      影响因子:1.90
    • 中华医学
      期刊级别:CSCD核心期刊
      发行周期:周刊
      出版地区:北京
      影响因子:0.94