注册 | 登录 | 充值

首页-> 学术资讯 -> 文献解读

【热门文献】儿科自拭子对SARS-CoV-2检测敏感性的影响

文献解读

2022-09-08      

802 0


尽管SARS-CoV-2检测的范围在扩大,但现有的检测方法尚未获得紧急使用授权,用于自行收集14岁以下儿童前鼻孔(鼻)拭子的检测,因为儿科自拭子对SARS-CoV-2检测敏感性的影响尚不清楚。该研究旨在比较学龄儿童自采鼻拭子检测SARS-CoV-2的能力和医务人员采集的能力。


研究纳入197例患者,数据结果显示与医务人员采集的拭子相比,自我采集的拭子阳性率和阴性阳性率分别为97.8% (95% CI, 94.7%-100.0%)和98.1% (95% CI, 95.6%-100.0%),组间SARS-CoV-2 Ct值无显著差异(平均[SD] Ct,自我拭子:26.7 [5.4]vs医务人员拭子:26.3 [6.0];P =0.65)。


4 ~ 14岁的儿童和青少年在听到和看到简单的指导材料后,自行采集后,会得到与医护人员采集的拭子检测SARS-CoV-2接近的鼻拭子。


Abstract

Importance: Despite the expansion of SARS-CoV-2 testing, available tests have not received Emergency Use Authorization for performance with self-collected anterior nares (nasal) swabs from children younger than 14 years because the effect of pediatric self-swabbing on SARS-CoV-2 test sensitivity is unknown.

Objective: To characterize the ability of school-aged children to self-collect nasal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 testing compared with collection by health care workers.

Design, setting, and participants: Cross-sectional study of 197 symptomatic children and adolescents aged 4 to 14 years old. Individuals were recruited based on results of testing in the Children's Healthcare of Atlanta system from July to August 2021.

Exposures: Children and adolescents were given instructional material consisting of a short instructional video and a handout with written and visual steps for self-swab collection. Participants first provided a self-collected nasal swab. Health care workers then collected a second specimen.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 detection and relative quantitation by cycle threshold (Ct) in self- vs health care worker-collected nasal swabs when tested with a real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction test with Emergency Use Authorization.

Results: Among the study participants, 108 of 194 (55.7%) were male and the median age was 9 years (IQR, 6-11). Of the 196 participants, 87 (44.4%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 and 105 (53.6%) tested negative by both self- and health care worker-collected swabs. Two children tested positive by self- or health care worker-collected swab alone; 1 child had an invalid health care worker swab. Compared with health care worker-collected swabs, self-collected swabs had 97.8% (95% CI, 94.7%-100.0%) and 98.1% (95% CI, 95.6%-100.0%) positive and negative percent agreement, respectively, and SARS-CoV-2 Ct values did not differ significantly between groups (mean [SD] Ct, self-swab: 26.7 [5.4] vs health care worker swab: 26.3 [6.0]; P = .65).

Conclusions and relevance: After hearing and seeing simple instructional materials, children and adolescents aged 4 to 14 years self-collected nasal swabs that closely agreed on SARS-CoV-2 detection with swabs collected by health care workers.


文章连接:

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2795837



科研资讯(站内):

百度浏览   来源 : 医微客   


版权声明:本网站所有注明来源“医微客”的文字、图片和音视频资料,版权均属于医微客所有,非经授权,任何媒体、网站或个人不得转载,授权转载时须注明来源:”医微客”。本网所有转载文章系出于传递更多信息之目的,且明确注明来源和作者,转载仅作观点分享,版权归原作者所有。不希望被转载的媒体或个人可与我们联系,我们将立即进行删除处理。 本站拥有对此声明的最终解释权。

科研搜索(百度):医学科研





发表评论

注册或登后即可发表评论

登录注册

全部评论(0)

没有更多评论了哦~

科研资讯 更多>>
  • 基层医疗“卷”起来了!卫健委开..
  • 肿瘤DNA甲基化标志物检测及临床..
  • 最新版《北大核心期刊目录》正式..
  • 以患者为中心营销策略分析(下)..
  • 推荐阅读 更多>>
  • 【热门文献】COVID-19对人类生活..
  • 【热门文献】微创食管切除术后直..
  • 【热门文献】经颈静脉肝内门体分..
  • 【热门文献】TIPS术后并发大量自..
    • 相关阅读
    • 热门专题
    • 推荐期刊
    • 学院课程
    • 医药卫生
      期刊级别:国家级期刊
      发行周期:暂无数据
      出版地区:其他
      影响因子:暂无数据
    • 中华肿瘤
      期刊级别:北大核心期刊
      发行周期:月刊
      出版地区:北京
      影响因子:1.90
    • 中华医学
      期刊级别:CSCD核心期刊
      发行周期:周刊
      出版地区:北京
      影响因子:0.94